Auto insurance companies are offering “death by one thousand cuts” coverage that would let them kill their customers, in an attempt to get around a law that requires insurers to cover the loss of life when a vehicle crashes into a person.

These companies include: AutoInsuranceGroup.com, AutoInsurerGroup.org, AutoLoanHelp.com.

These websites, which allow consumers to set up auto loans, do not provide any guarantee that their coverage will pay for the losses.

If the claims go to court, they are covered under the law.

However, it is possible for them to charge higher rates.

In this case, they say that they offer coverage that is “for as long as it is necessary to protect the health and safety of all members of the insured.”

According to the companies, this is an optional feature.

If consumers do not opt in, they can cancel at any time, but if they do opt in and don’t pay for it, they will be charged $1,500 in the first year of coverage.

They also have a 30-day grace period in which they can stop offering the coverage if the consumer opts out.

According to a recent report, the average premium charged by auto insurance in the US is $8,700.

Auto insurance is not a regulated industry in the same way as other forms of insurance, and it is unclear how these companies would be able to determine that the insured would qualify for the policy if they did not opt into it.

The companies say that “this is an option available to all auto insurance carriers.”

However, the companies are not offering this coverage, which would be illegal under the current law, which states that “no person shall be required to pay any premium, charge, or expense for coverage for injuries caused by the operation of any motor vehicle.”

According the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), this law also covers deaths due to accident.

Insurance companies are required to cover losses incurred as a result of an accident.

However in recent years, a number of states have passed laws requiring auto insurance to cover certain losses in certain circumstances, including when a driver is hit by a car, when an accident occurs in an enclosed parking space, or when the driver’s own vehicle is involved in a collision.

However some states have enacted legislation that exempts certain losses from this coverage.

“The industry has moved away from these laws and instead is attempting to push for an outright exemption of losses incurred during accidents, which are usually the result of drivers operating under the influence of alcohol or drugs,” the IIHS says.

The IIHS also says that “it is unclear what is actually driving this legislation.

For instance, it may be that states have been encouraged by the Supreme Court’s decision in the recent case of State v.

Robinson, which invalidated some of the state’s laws governing motor vehicle insurance.

The court found that states that required insurance to be paid for by a drivers’ license were not adequately protecting the rights of drivers.”

According a survey by the Insurance Information Institute, 55% of auto insurance claims are covered by “uninsured motorist” or “non-insured” coverage.

The survey also found that the average rate charged by these companies is $1.20 per claim.

In 2015, insurers in Arizona reported $1 billion in losses in claims and a net loss of $8.3 billion.

“I would encourage all insurance companies to take a look at what these companies are doing and then reconsider whether it is worth their while to offer these policies,” said Joe McDonough, senior vice president of consumer protection at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).

“We need to find a solution for all of these claims that are being made on these websites.”

The National Association for Insurance Commissioners also notes that insurers in states that did not enact these laws are not required to provide any of the other insurance coverage, and the company that offers the coverage does not have to follow all of the laws that apply to other insurers.

“There is no legal requirement that the company offering insurance in those states have to provide all of their policies to consumers,” McDonuff said.

However McDonou said that if the states that do not allow insurance companies or the insurance companies themselves to offer auto insurance are willing to provide coverage, then it could be a solution.

“If they are willing, I would expect that the industry would respond in a reasonable and effective way,” he said.

This story has been updated to reflect that a number have asked the NAIC to investigate whether they have been in violation of the law or are violating it.

This article has been corrected to correct the spelling of a person’s name.